support@tutorialsexperts.us
+1 315 765 7646
Need Consultation? Contact us
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

Order 100% Original
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

Order 100% Original
  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout

No products in the cart.

  • Tutorials
  • About us
  • Services
    • Essay Writing
    • Research Paper
    • Thesis Writing
  • My Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout
Shop
Home ENG 106 ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Discussions
Awaiting product image

ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Discussions

$50

Category: ENG 106 Tags: ENG 106 Complete DQs, ENG 106 GCU All Week DQ, ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Discussions, ENG106GCUAllWeekDQ, ENG106GrandCanyonAllWeekDiscussions
  • Description
  • Reviews (0)

ENG 106 Grand Canyon All Week Discussions

ENG106

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 1

Throughout this course, you will be researching, discussing, and writing about the donation and sale of human organs. To assist you in the research, the lectures and supplemental readings provide different perspectives on this complex and controversial topic. Please use the “Resource List” document to find and read articles about the sale of human organs.

After you have read about this topic, identify and discuss in 100-125 words one potential cause for this phenomenon.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 1 Discussion 2

Your text and lectures discuss the importance of enthymemes in writing arguments. Create enthymemes (claims and reasons) that are appropriate for each of the essay genres (i.e., causal argument, ethical argument, and proposal argument).

Here is an example of an enthymeme:

Proposal essay: Should school cafeterias be required to offer only nutritionally balanced meals?

CLAIM: School cafeterias should exclusively serve nutritionally balanced meals.

REASON: Because obesity rates among school age children are increasing.

Causal argument essay: What is one cause of the sale of human organs?

CLAIM:

REASON:

Ethical argument: Is the sale of human organs right or wrong?

CLAIM:

REASON:

Proposal argument: Should the sale and purchase of human organs be made legal?

CLAIM:

REASON:

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Discussion 1

After reading Christian Longo’s essay in Chapter 13, please consider the following:

A potential definition argument centers on whether a prisoner can voluntarily donate organs. Prisoners and human rights advocates might disagree about what voluntary donation means: Is organ donation voluntary if prisoners receive the same counseling as donors outside of the prison system, or is it only voluntary if a person is not facing death (in this case, not on death row)? If someone were to develop this argument, they would define voluntary and then explain how a particular case such as Christian Longo’s matches their definition of voluntary. What do you think about this issue? What does voluntary mean to you, and under what circumstances would inmates in our prison system be voluntarily offering to donate their organs? At what point do you think they would be involuntarily signing up to donate organs?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Discussion 2

Read “Legalizing the Organ Trade?” by Ritter, located on the Time website.

.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1833858,00.html”>http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1833858,00.html

As noted in Peter Ritter’s (2008) “Legalizing the Organ Trade?”, Singapore’s health minister, Khaw Boon Wan, argued that “We may be able to find an acceptable way to allow a meaningful compensation for some living, unrelated kidney donors, without breaching ethical principles or hurting the sensitivities of others” (Ritter, 2008). You might ask yourself: What constitutes “meaningful compensation” for an organ donor, especially if the donor is poor and the recipient is wealthy? What examples of human organ sales can you find that match or do not match your definition of “meaningful compensation”?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 1

Dr. Francis Delmonico believes that even a regulated human organ trade would be exploitative because “It’s the poor person who sells” (Meckler, 2007). Do you agree that allowing a poor person to sell an organ is an exploitative practice? Why or why not? What examples from real-life organ donors can you provide that help you demonstrate how a regulated human organ trade would be (or not be) exploitative?

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 3 Discussion 2

Do you think the human organ trade should be legal or illegal, depending on your perspective? How do human organs compare (or not compare) with other types of commodities especially those that have some degree of legal restrictions such as prescription medicine?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussion 1

As you have learned in the lectures in Topics 1 and 4, a causal claim argues that one thing leads to another (e.g., “Increasing levels of acidity in sea water are harming the oceans’ coral reefs.”). A causal chain links causal claims together as links in a chain. There is an excellent example of how to use direct explanation in the creation of a causal chain on page 262 in your textbook.

Summarize the causal chain used by the writer in the article from The New York Times. Was the argument persuasive? Why or why not?

What has caused the growth of selling human organs, a concept unthinkable 100 years ago? What has caused the growth of selling human organs on the black market?

What are the causes you will write about in your draft?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussion 2

As the lectures for this topic indicate, there are two ways to argue effectively that one phenomenon causes or influences another: causal chains and inductive reasoning. The most common and persuasive approach is the former, in which each step in the cause-and-effect process is itemized and explained. There is an excellent example of how to use direct explanation in the creation of a causal chain on page 262 in your textbook.

Develop a causal chain showing how the invention of the automobile led to changes in sexual mores (Ramage, Bean & Johnson, 2012, p.260).

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 1

Please read the summary of religious views on organ donation in “Religious Views on Donation.” http://www.organdonor.gov/about/religiousviews.html

Select one religion about which you are knowledgeable and develop a causal chain connecting the religion’s core beliefs with its stance on organ donation. If you are not knowledgeable about any religion, please research a religion of your choice to complete this activity.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 2

Use the STAR criteria described in your textbook in Chapter 5 and the lecture to evaluate the sources you are planning to use. How well do your sources meet these criteria? Explain your reasoning.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Discussion 1

To whom will you address your proposal? Remember: This person (or group) will be skeptical of your views. Will it be a friend or family member with different beliefs and values related to health care and/or the human body? Are there individuals in the medical community who hold different values than you do? How about a politician or one of the authors of our readings?

What are their views on the issue of selling human organs, and what do they think should be done about it? Summarize the views of your skeptical audience as fairly and accurately as possible.

During the week, review your classmates’ summaries of their skeptical audiences’ views. How well do you think they did? Were the summaries fair, or did they seem biased? How can you tell? Give them some pointers on revising their summaries.

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Discussion 2

Use the following questions to develop ideas for your proposal.

  1. What do you think is the most significant problem regarding the sale of organs?
  2. Why do you think it is a problem?
  3. Who has the power to solve this problem?
  4. Why has it not been solved up to this point?
  5. How can the problem be solved?
  6. What are the benefits and costs related to your solution?

Using previous strategies for argumentation discussed in class, develop some arguments for your proposal that you could use for your skeptical audience. (Use arguments from consequence, arguments from principle, arguments from category, and arguments of resemblance as you see fit.)

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussion 1

In the lecture, Rebekah Taylor’s argument in “A Letter to Jim” follows a particular arrangement of ideas. Your proposal should do the same thing. In other words, your proposal should follow this outline:

  1. Open cordially and introduce the issue
  2. Summarize the opposing view fairly and accurately while recognizing their importance
  3. Summarize your own view of the issue without arguing that the opposing views are wrong
  4. Find common ground on which to build a compromise
  5. Argue in favor of a perspective that both you and your skeptical audience can agree on
  6. Propose a compromise

To what extent did you arrange your letter to follow this organizational pattern? To what extent does it deviate from this organizational pattern? How do you plan to fix the pattern of arrangement in your letter?

 

ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 7 Discussion 2

In the lecture, we discussed how the Rogerian style of argument requires a conciliatory style. How does Rebekah Taylor show Jim that she means no harm and that she does not wish to pursue a heated debate? How well does your own letter follow Rebekah Taylor’s example? What did you do well? How could you improve? Provide some examples.

During the week, respond to your classmates’ posts and comment on their use of a conciliatory style.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Related products

  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 3 Assignment

    $26 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 6 Discussions

    $9 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 1 Assignments

    $32 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Complete Week DQ Pack Latest-GCU

    $55 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 7 Discussions Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Complete Week Assignments Pack Latest-GCU

    $130 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 4 Benchmark First Draft Latest-GCU

    $22 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 2 Definition Essay First Draft Latest-GCU

    $20 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 5 Discussions Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Discussions

    $9 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 4 Discussions

    $9 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 4 Peer Review Assignment Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment

    $26 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 5 Benchmark Final Draft-GCU

    $22 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 6 Peer Review Assignment Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 2 Discussions Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 6 Proposal Argument First Draft Latest-GCU

    $15 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Week 6 Discussions Latest-GCU

    $10 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignments

    $48 Add to cart
  • Placeholder

    ENG 106 English Composition II Full Course Latest-GCU

    $180 Add to cart
Categories
  • ACC 2409
  • ACC 25017
  • ACC 35012
  • ACC 37012
  • ACC 37111
  • ACC 46016
  • ACC 48519
  • ACC 48611
  • ACC 4913
  • ACC 61311
  • ACC 61624
  • ACC 62219
  • ACC 65011
  • ACC 65111
  • ACC 66018
  • ACC 66211
  • ACC 66411
  • ACC 66511
  • ACC 66719
  • ACC 66819
  • ACC 6901
  • ACC 6919
  • ADM 6141
  • ADM 6241
  • ADM 6261
  • ADM 6321
  • ADM 6341
  • ADM 6361
  • AMP 41511
  • AMP 42511
  • AMP 4341
  • AMP 450V6
  • AMP 49211
  • BIO 22010
  • BIO 31610
  • BIO 50017
  • BIO 5509
  • BUS 34011
  • BUS 35223
  • BUS 37219
  • BUS 48511
  • BUS 62312
  • BUS 66019
  • COM 23110
  • COM 26325
  • COM 31511
  • COM 36221
  • CWV 1018
  • DNP 81028
  • DNP 81515
  • DNP 83025
  • DNP 83518
  • DNP 84021
  • DNP 95511
  • DNP 9609
  • ECH 5201
  • ECN 22025
  • ECN 35119
  • ECN 36021
  • ECN 45019
  • ECN 60122
  • ECS 50118
  • ECS 55513
  • ECS 56016
  • ECS 57015
  • ECS 59020
  • EDU 33019
  • EED 4751
  • ELM 20018
  • ELM 30522
  • ELM 35012
  • ELM 35123
  • ELM 54018
  • EMM 4155
  • EMM 44211
  • EMM 64111
  • ENG 10639
  • ENT 43520
  • FIN 35019
  • FIN 45011
  • FIN 45111
  • FIN 65030
  • Finance53
  • HCA 61017
  • HCA 62016
  • HCA 67511
  • HCA 80715
  • HCA 81216
  • HCA 82215
  • HCI 60017
  • HLT 205V10
  • HLT 30213
  • HLT 306V14
  • HLT 307V3
  • HLT 308V7
  • HLT 310V12
  • HLT 312V7
  • HLT 313V8
  • HLT 314V6
  • HLT 317V10
  • HLT 324V12
  • HLT 362V16
  • HLT 418V8
  • HLT 51517
  • HLT 52020
  • HLT 54011
  • HLT 60017
  • HLT 60517
  • INT 24417
  • JUS 1109
  • JUS 50524
  • JUS 51037
  • JUS 5153
  • JUS 52011
  • JUS 52111
  • JUS 52416
  • JUS 53134
  • JUS 6102
  • JUS 6209
  • LDR 46215
  • LDR 60026
  • LDR 61515
  • LDR 62012
  • LDR 63023
  • LDR 6401
  • LDR 80416
  • MAT 1348
  • MAT 15012
  • MGT 24010
  • MGT 42011
  • MGT 43411
  • MGT 45511
  • MGT 60511
  • MGT 65512
  • MGT 66019
  • MGT 8109
  • MGT 8154
  • MIN 82214
  • MIS 60018
  • MIS 61019
  • MIS 66019
  • MIS 66520
  • MIS 69021
  • MKT 24510
  • MKT 31515
  • MKT 45029
  • MKT 60738
  • NRS 410V8
  • NRS 427V6
  • NRS 429V8
  • NRS 430V8
  • NRS 433V9
  • NRS 434V8
  • NRS 437V7
  • NRS 4408
  • NRS 4418
  • NRS 451V13
  • NRS 49015
  • NRS 493 GCU47
  • NUR 50211
  • NUR 50419
  • NUR 50811
  • NUR 550 GCU1
  • NUR 647E14
  • NUR 67046
  • NUR 69926
  • PCN 50011
  • PCN 50111
  • PCN 52011
  • PCN 6051
  • PHI 10510
  • PHI 413V18
  • POS 50014
  • PSC 4109
  • PSC 4957
  • PSY 1009
  • PSY 10228
  • PSY 52023
  • PSY 53019
  • PSY 55015
  • PSY 62211
  • PSY 65510
  • PSY 6621
  • PSY 66314
  • PSY 8603
  • RES 831 GCU1
  • RES 832 GCU1
  • RES 8618
  • RES 866 GCU2
  • RES 88519
  • RSD 8511
  • SMM7
  • SOC 10055
  • SOC 2201
  • SOC 38617
  • SOC 4129
  • SOC 44518
  • SOC 44917
  • SPD 31021
  • SPD 32014
  • SYM 50611
  • TCH 5171
  • TCH 5241
  • TCH 53910
  • TSL 53215
  • TSL 55012
  • TSL 55214
  • TSL 55813
  • TSL 56715
  • Uncategorized12
  • UNV 10315
  • UNV 10411
  • UNV 5027
  • UNV 503V6
  • UNV 5047

Tutorials Experts is a US based tutorials company head quartered into Delaware. We aim to provide study help with load of knowledge for every program being studied into Grand Canyon University.
Services
Custom Essay Writing
Research Paper Writing
Dissertation Writing Service
Social Media
Coursework Writing
Term Paper Writing
Contacts
Adress: 2803 Philadelphia Pike, Suite B #1121, Claymont, DE 19703.
Website: https://tutorialsexperts.us/
Email: support@tutorialsexperts.us
Phone: +1 315 765 7646
Fax: +1 315 765 7646
Newsletter

Signup for our newsletter and stay connected with our recent discounts and promotions.

Terms of use | Privacy Environmental Policy
  • Shop
  • About us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • My Account

Copyright © 2022 Tutorials Services LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The products and services provided by Tutorials Experts are for research and guidance purposes only. Students are solely responsible for doing their own work and using the materials provided as a reference.

WhatsApp us